[Click to Enlarge]
Lindsay Lohan is (unflatteringly featured) in a series of photos for the October issue of
Elle, supposedly, because she's some sort of go-to girl for style. And conveniently enough, it afforded
LiLo the opportunity to pimp a tattered-looking pair of leggings [seen above] from her line--
6126 (so named because that's
Marylin Monroe's birthday).
More than anything, though, I wonder what the heck was
Elle thinking with this spread?' (No offense to photographer
Stephen Shore.) The funky cropping, in some of the photos, lends a weird catalog vibe. And that aside,
Lohan looks pretty effing terrible (exempting maybe the top pic).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce6df/ce6dffe9a061c3ba88240b67d9025c318edfd28b" alt=""
This pic [below] was a candidate for the most fug, despite a cute green, wool and silk Oscar de la Renta dress, because when enlarged to scale
Lohan, 22, looks like an old, haggard, bleached-out mess.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fc3e/5fc3e175b548f308e52f2e506c0eefdfc34b5688" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea952/ea9526dfc2b3f56914056076a46f6e3dae646922" alt=""
Also, it looks like her left eye is freaking missing. However, worse still...
Elle had her rock a pair of, the
much ridiculed, frumpy
Katie Holmes jeans.
The rest of the mess...
0 comments:
Post a Comment